Full Text Journal Articles from
Abstract 32950046

Advertisement

Find full text journal articles








Interobserver and intermethod variability in data interpretation of breast strain elastography in suspicious breast lesions.

PMID: 32950046 (view PubMed database entry)
DOI: 10.3906/sag-2006-257 (read at publisher's website )

Hale TurnaoĞlu, Kemal Murat Haberal, Serdar Arslan, MerİÇ Yavuz Çolak, Funda Ulu ÖztÜrk, Nİhal Uslu,

BACKGROUND/AIM:Strain elastography has the disadvantage of being operator-dependent. Interobserver variability is observed during image acquisition and interpretation. This study aimed to analyze the interobserver and intermethod variability of strain elastography in image interpretation and evaluate the diagnostic performance combining elasticity score and strain ratio with ultrasonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted on 70 breast lesions evaluated with B-mode ultrasonography and strain elastography. B-mode ultrasonography ?ndings, elasticity scores, and strain ratio values were evaluated using static images by two radiologists. BI-RADS assessment of the lesions and the decision of both observers for whether the biopsy was required using B-mode ultrasonography, and the combined ultrasonography+elasticity score, and the combined ultrasonography+elasticity score+strain ratio, were compared with the histopathological results. Also, the interobserver agreement was analyzed for all combinations. RESULTS:There was very good agreement (weighted ? = 0.865) between the observers for the elasticity scores. Very good agreement was observed between the observers for BI-RADS assessments using the combined ultrasonography+elasticity score and the combined ultrasonography+elasticity score+strain ratio (weighted ? = 0.848, and 0.902, respectively). Area under the curve of B-mode ultrasonography, the combined B-mode ultrasonography+elasticity score, and the combined B-mode ultrasonography+elasticity score+strain ratio, were calculated as 0.859, 0.866, 0.916 for observer 1, and 0.851, 0.829, 0.916 for observer 2, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the observers' diagnostic performances in all combinations (p=0.703, 0.067, and 0.972, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:In the evaluation and further assessment of breast lesions, semi-quantitative strain ratio calculation may help improve diagnostic accuracy by reducing interpretational variety, when used together with B-mode ultrasonography and elasticity scoring, especially for inexperienced individuals.

Turk J Med Sci (Turkish journal of medical sciences)
[2020, :]

Cited: 0 times

AltMetric Statistics

Additional resources:




Advertisement

Disclaimer
0.4549 s