Full Text Journal Articles from
Abstract 19923391

Advertisement

Find full text journal articles








Energy restriction is associated with lower bone mineral density of the tibia and femur in lean but not obese female rats.

PMID: 19923391 (view PubMed database entry)
DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.111450 (read at publisher's website )
PMCID: PMC2793120 (free full text version available)

Download PDF Download PDF

Jaleah Hawkins, Mariana Cifuentes, Nancy L Pleshko, Hasina Ambia-Sobhan, Sue A Shapses,

Energy restriction decreases bone mineral density (BMD), and epidemiological studies suggest that the risk of weight loss-induced bone loss is greater in lean than in heavier individuals. Our goal in this study was to determine how bone density and geometry respond to energy restriction in mature obese rats compared with lean rats. At 6 mo of age, 36 diet-induced obese and lean female Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to control (CTL; ad libitum; n = 18) and energy-restricted (EnR; 40% restriction; n = 18) diets. After 10 wk of dietary intervention, obese EnR rats lost more weight (-91 +/- 34 g) than lean EnR rats(-61 +/- 14 g) (P < 0.02), [corrected] whereas body weight did not change significantly in the 2 CTL groups (14 +/- 23 g). Only the lean EnR (and not obese EnR) rats showed lower BMD compared with CTL rats at the tibia, distal, and proximal femur and femoral neck, and trabecular bone volume (P < 0.05). Serum estradiol declined in lean EnR rats compared with baseline (P < 0.05) but not in the obese EnR rats. In addition, the final serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentration was higher (P < 0.05) in obese than in lean EnR rats. Serum parathyroid hormone decreased (P < 0.05) from baseline to final in lean and obese CTL, but not EnR rats. These data support the hypothesis that energy restriction in lean rats compared with obese rats is more detrimental to bone, and it is possible that the greater decline in estrogen and lower levels of 25OHD contribute to this effect.

J Nutr (The Journal of nutrition)
[2010, 140(1):31-37]

Cited: 14 times

AltMetric Statistics




Advertisement


Disclaimer

0.6792 s